Parental Leave Policies in Residency: A National Survey of Internal Medicine Program Directors.

PURPOSE: To characterize the existence, accessibility, and content of parental leave policies, as well as barriers to program-level policy implementation among internal medicine (IM) program directors (PDs) and to assess the willingness of PDs to implement a national standardized policy. METHOD: In 2019, the Association of Program Directors in Internal Medicine conducted a survey of 422 IM PDs. Along with other content, 38 questions addressed 4 primary outcomes: parental leave policy existence, accessibility, content, and barriers. The authors compared programs with and without a program-level policy and applied qualitative content analysis to open-ended questions about barriers to policy implementation and openness to a national standard. RESULTS: The response rate was 69.4% (293/422). Of responding programs, 86% (250/290) reported a written parental leave policy with 43% (97/225) of these originating at the program level. Program-level policies, compared with policies at other levels, were more likely to address scheduling during pregnancy (38%, 36/95 vs 22%, 27/124; P = .018); peer coverage (24%, 21/89 vs 15%, 16/109; P = .037), how the duration of extended training is determined (81%, 72/89 vs 44%, 48/109; P < .001), and associated pay and benefits 61%, 54/89 vs 44%, 48/109; P = .009). PDs without program-level policy reported lacking guidance to develop policy, deferring upward to institutional policies, and wishing to retain flexibility. More than half of PDs (60%, 170/282) expressed agreement that a national standard for a residency program-level parental leave policy should exist. Those not in favor cited organization equity, lack of resources, implementation challenges, loss of flexibility, and potentially disadvantaging recruitment. CONCLUSIONS: While existing program-level policies included important content, most PDs reported not having them. A national standard to guide the development of program-level parental leave policies could be embraced if it provided flexibility for programs with limited resources.

"Tell Me More": Students Can Practice and Self-Evaluate Primary Palliative Care Skills in a Large, Multistate Internal Medicine Clerkship.

Background: Experts recommend integrating palliative care throughout the four-year medical school curriculum, including in required clerkships such as internal medicine (IM). Objective: The aim of this study was to determine whether third-year medical students could gain meaningful experience in primary palliative care during their IM clerkship with observation and feedback from internists and/or IM residents or fellows. Design: We implemented two clinical exercises: (1) perform advance care planning with a patient and (2) participate in the delivery of important news. Students self-reported aspects of their experience in a confidential online survey. Setting/Subjects: Third-year medical students enrolled in a required IM clerkship. Measurements: Students reported the setting in which they completed the exercises, their level of independence, and their level of comfort with advance care planning after completing the exercise. We performed a qualitative analysis of open-ended comments to determine domains, themes, and subthemes and a separate analysis to determine the extent to which the comments suggested learning relevant to the stated learning objectives for each exercise. Results: The majority of students completed both exercises without palliative care specialists present, 76% (196/258) for the advance care planning exercise and 75% (195/259) for important news. Fifty-one percent (132/258) of students completed advance care planning with a significant level of independence, and 70% (182/258) reported being comfortable or very comfortable with advance care planning after completing the exercise. Qualitative analyses of student comments found that the majority of students described learning something related to the stated learning objectives for each exercise and suggested that they gained an appreciation of the complexity of patient-provider interactions around serious illness and palliative care. Conclusion: We found it feasible to integrate clinical exercises in advance care planning and delivering important news into an IM clerkship.

Childbearing Decisions in Residency: A Multicenter Survey of Female Residents.

PURPOSE: To characterize how female residents make decisions about childbearing, factors associated with the decision to delay childbearing, and satisfaction with these decisions. METHOD: In 2017, the authors sent a voluntary, anonymous survey to 1,537 female residents enrolled across 78 graduate medical education programs, consisting of 25 unique specialties, at 6 U.S. academic medical centers. Survey items included personal, partner, and institutional characteristics, whether the respondent was delaying childbearing during residency, and the respondent's satisfaction with this decision. RESULTS: The survey response rate was 52% (n = 804). Among the 447 (56%) respondents who were married or partnered, 274 (61%) were delaying childbearing. Residents delaying childbearing were significantly more likely to be younger (P < .001), not currently a parent (P < .001), in a specialty with an uncontrollable lifestyle (P = .001), or in a large program (P = .004). Among self-reported reasons for delaying childbearing, which were not mutually exclusive, the majority cited a busy work schedule (n = 255; 93%) and desire not to extend residency training (n = 145; 53%). Many cited lack of access to childcare (n = 126; 46%), financial concerns (n = 116; 42%), fear of burdening colleagues (n = 96; 35%), and concern for pregnancy complications (n = 74; 27%). Only 38% (n = 103) of respondents delaying childbearing were satisfied with this decision, with satisfaction decreasing with increasing age. CONCLUSIONS: Decisions to delay childbearing are more common in certain specialties, and many residents who delay childbearing are not satisfied with that decision. These findings suggest that greater attention is needed overall, and particularly in certain specialties, to promote policies and cultures that both anticipate and normalize parenthood in residency, thus minimizing the conflict between biological and professional choices for female residents.

Parenthood During Graduate Medical Education: A Scoping Review.

PURPOSE: To conduct a scoping review of the literature on parenthood during graduate medical education (GME) and to develop a conceptual framework to inform policy and guide research. METHOD: The authors searched PubMed and Embase for articles published from January 1993 through August 7, 2017, using a query framework that combined the concepts of "person" (e.g., "trainee") and "parenthood" (e.g., "breastfeeding"). They included studies describing parenthood or pregnancy of trainees in U.S. GME training programs. Two authors independently screened citations and abstracts and performed kappa coefficient tests to evaluate interreviewer reliability. Two authors performed a full-text review of and extracted data from each included article, and 4 authors coded data for all articles. The authors used descriptive statistics and qualitative synthesis to analyze data. RESULTS: Ninety articles met inclusion criteria, and nearly half (43/90; 48%) were published between 2010 and 2017. The authors developed 6 themes that surround resident parenthood: well-being, maternal health, others' perceptions, relationships, program preparation, and policy. They mapped these themes by relationship of stakeholders (e.g., infant and family, institutions) to the resident-parent to create a conceptual framework describing parenthood during GME. CONCLUSIONS: The findings from this scoping review have implications for policy and research. Those authoring parental leave policies could collaborate with national board leaders to develop consistent standards and include nontraditional families. Gaps in the literature include the effect of resident parenthood on patient care, postpartum health, and policy execution. Research in these areas would advance the literature on parenthood during residency.

Maternity Leave in Residency: A Multicenter Study of Determinants and Wellness Outcomes.

PURPOSE: To characterize determinants of resident maternity leave and the effect of length of leave on maternal well-being. METHOD: In 2017, the authors sent a voluntary, anonymous survey to female residents at 78 programs, in 25 unique specialties, at 6 institutions. Survey items included personal, partner, and child demographics, and logistics of leave, including whether leave was paid or vacation or sick leave was used. Outcomes were maternity leave length; duration of breastfeeding; burnout and postpartum depression screens; perceptions of support; and satisfaction with length of leave, breastfeeding, and childbearing during residency. RESULTS: Fifty-two percent (804/1,537) of residents responded. Among 16% (126) of respondents who were mothers, 50% (63) had their first child during residency. Seventy-seven maternity leaves were reported (range, 2-40 weeks), with most taking 6 weeks (32% of leaves; 25) and including vacation (81%; 62) or sick leave (64%; 49). Length of leave was associated with institution, use of sick leave or vacation, and amount of paid leave. The most frequently self-reported determinant of leave was the desire not to extend residency training (27%; 59). Training was not extended for 53% (41) of mothers; 9% (7) were unsure. Longer breastfeeding duration and perceptions of logistical support from program administration were associated with longer maternity leaves. Burnout affected approximately 50% (38) of mothers regardless of leave length. CONCLUSIONS: This study illustrates variability in administration of resident maternity leaves. Targets for intervention include policy clarification, improving program support, and consideration of parent wellness upon return to work.

Childbearing and maternity leave in residency: determinants and well-being outcomes.

PURPOSE: To characterise determinants of resident maternity leave and their effect on maternal and infant well-being. Among non-parents, to identify factors that influence the decision to delay childbearing STUDY DESIGN: In 2016, a survey was sent to female residents at a large academic medical centre on their experiences with maternity leave, the impact of personal and programme factors on length of leave, reasons for delaying childbearing and measures of well-being. RESULTS: Forty-four percent (214/481) of residents responded. Fifty (23%) residents were parents, and 25 (12%) took maternity leave during training. The average maternity leave length was 8.4 weeks and did not differ across programme type, size or programme director gender but was longer for programmes with fewer women than men. The most common self-reported determinant of leave was financial. Residents with >8 weeks of leave were less likely to have postpartum depression or burnout and more likely to breastfeed longer, perceive support from colleagues and programme directors, and be satisfied with resident parenthood. Among 104 non-parents who were married or partnered, 84 (81%) were delaying childbearing, citing busy work schedules, concern for burdening colleagues and finances. CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that multiple aspects of resident wellbeing are associated with longer maternity leaves, yet finances and professional relationships hinder length of leave and lead to delayed childbearing. These issues could be addressed at a programme level with clear policies describing how work is redistributed during parental leave and at an institutional and state level through provision of paid family leave.

"It's Not Just Time Off": A Framework for Understanding Factors Promoting Recovery From Burnout Among Internal Medicine Residents.

BACKGROUND: Burnout rates for internal medicine residents are among the highest of all specialties, yet little is known about how residents recover from burnout. OBJECTIVE: We identified factors promoting recovery from burnout and factors that assist with the subsequent avoidance of burnout among internal medicine residents. METHODS: A purposive sample of postgraduate year 2 (PGY-2), PGY-3, and recent graduates who experienced and recovered from burnout during residency participated in semistructured, 60-minute interviews from June to August 2016. Using qualitative methods derived from grounded theory, saturation of themes occurred after 25 interviews. Coding was performed in an iterative fashion and consensus was reached on major themes. RESULTS: Coding revealed 2 different categories of resident burnout-circumstantial and existential-with differing recovery and avoidance methods. Circumstantial burnout stemmed from self-limited circumstances and environmental triggers. Recovery from, and subsequent avoidance of, circumstantial burnout arose from (1) resolving workplace challenges; (2) nurturing personal lives; and (3) taking time off. In contrast, existential burnout stemmed from a loss of meaning in medicine and an uncertain professional role. These themes were identified around recovery: (1) recognizing burnout and feeling validated; (2) connecting with patients and colleagues; (3) finding meaning in medicine; and (4) redefining a professional identity and role. CONCLUSIONS: Our study suggests that residents experience different types of burnout and have variable methods by which they recover from and avoid further burnout. Categorizing residents' burnout into circumstantial versus existential experiences may serve as a helpful framework for formulating interventions.

Sutureless vs Sutured Gastroschisis Closure: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial.

BACKGROUND: Sutureless gastroschisis repair involves covering the abdominal wall defect with the umbilical cord or a synthetic dressing to allow closure by secondary intention. No randomized studies have described the outcomes of this technique. Our objective was to prospectively compare short-term outcomes of sutureless vs sutured closure in a randomized fashion. STUDY DESIGN: We recruited patients who presented with gastroschisis between 2009 and 2014 and were randomized into either sutureless or sutured treatment groups. Patients with complicated gastroschisis (stricture, perforation, and ischemia) were excluded. Predefined ventilation, feeding, and dressing change protocols were instituted. Primary outcomes were time to extubation and time to full feeds. Secondary outcomes included time to discharge and rate of complications. Data were analyzed using Fisher's exact or t-tests using a p value ≤ 0.05. Factors associated with increased time to discharge were estimated using multivariate analyses. RESULTS: Thirty-nine patients were enrolled, 19 to sutureless and 20 to sutured repair. There was no statistical difference in time to extubation (sutureless 1.89 vs sutured 3.15 days; p = 0.061). The sutureless group had a significant increase in mean time to full feeds (45.1 vs 27.8 days; p = 0.031) and mean time to discharge (49.3 vs 31.4 days; p = 0.016). Complication rates were similar in both groups. Multivariate regression modeling showed that an increase in time to discharge was independently associated with sutureless repair, feeding complications, and sepsis. CONCLUSIONS: Sutureless repair of uncomplicated gastroschisis can be performed safely, however, it is associated with a significant increase in time to full feeds and time to discharge.